
Continuing with my theme of “not ordinary”, I would like to point out some more floods in another Indian state – Orissa. There have been floods - and man-made at that - of bloodshed! Numerous inhuman (and fatal) attacks on Christians by fundamentalists claiming representation of the majority religious group in the state have rocked the Christian fraternity. There have been hundreds of instances of atrocities - killing people, including women and children, raping women including consecrated nuns, burning down churches and orphanages, making thousands of dalit and tribal Christians feel as hostages in their own land! Much of this violence is reactionary – against the concept of "Christian proselytism" or forced conversion. My parents have been followers of Jainism, which is deeply intertwined with Hinduism. They have followed Hindu religious philosophies and believed in Hindu Gods all their lives. Some of that has, surely, percolated to me as well. I am pondering. I am ponderous. I call a spade a spade. I know that Christian missionaries are working and have always worked for outcasts and the oppressed in India. They’ve worked for the unwanted female-child, for lepers and for the disease-stricken. They’ve opened orphanages, schools, vocation centers and doors of opportunity, even for the ones who were historically classified as untouchables, shudras or dalits. They have dared to reach far and wide into interiors and work with the common oppressed; communal violence and threats notwithstanding. God knows their work brings about positive transformation in society. Transformation is the key function of every religion. It is about improving the lot of people in a society. It is about fostering faith and hope. I, therefore, have an alternate (and more precise, if you will) conceptualization of “conversion” in my mind. I call it “transformation”. Yes, if such transformation (as opposed to “conversion”) happens within oneself, who is to morally judge and oppose the same? If a new religion can improve the lot of oppressed people, then, why the unnecessary moral judgments? And who exactly is morally judging? What does a VHP or a Bajrang Dal know? Who are these people who claim to be Hindus and kill innocent Christians? Who gives them custody to take lives? Is this the way they portray their religious morals? The killings, the fires, destruction and trauma in Orissa were accompanied by cries of “Jai Hanuman!”, “Jai Bajrangbali!” (Hail Lord Hanuman!). Killing in God’s name? Killing in orphanages? That’s a mockery of religious philosophy! And to think that Lord Hanuman is, among believers, the epitome of dedication and brotherhood (his dedication to Lord Rama is legendary, as documented in the Ramayana), and to compare that with the gory killings…oh, what a shame! Is this justice? Is this Hinduism? Far from that! It seems to me that these base fundamentalists are hiding behind a great religion. There are hundreds of millions of Hindus who are peaceful, tolerant, devoted to their faith; and above all, happy to live alongside people of other faiths. All religions teach us tolerance, love and peace. It is man who works the political dimension into religion and tries to maneuver it to his own benefit. Sometimes, there's no way of segregating religion and politics. They're like two shores of a river.






